
It is a truth universally acknowledged—by manufacturers—that an analog consumer product must be in want of electronics. Yes, even if you pee on that product.
Pregnancy tests are dead simple. Every manufacturer uses pretty much the same simple system: pee on stick, wait for chemical interactions, see a positive or negative result. They’re all the same product, which is why taglines such as “No test is more accurate” are true, because they’re literally all the same accuracy level.
So how does a manufacturer differentiate their pee stick? Pregnancy tests are a massive, growing, self-perpetuating market. Pregnancy anxiety is real, whether hoping or dreading, leading some to take a half-dozen (or more!) tests to be sure of a result. Enter the “digital” pregnancy test.
When most people consider the “digital” version of some utility product, they assume it’s a serious upgrade. Digital watches are easier to read than mechanical ones, keep time with tremendous accuracy, and add some cool features. Ditto digital thermometers, pressure gauges, and thermostats. But pregnancy tests in their analog form aren’t confusing or inaccurate. They’re black and white: the box assures you that even a faint positive should be read as a positive. So what exactly is the benefit of a digital pregnancy test? Turns out there aren’t any—just the drawbacks of yet more circuit boards in our waste stream.
Some teardowns on Twitter revealed that the inner workings of a so-called digital test are just a little gadget reading a normal paper test strip for you. A standard pregnancy test has a control line, and if positive, displays a second line. “Digital” tests shine some tiny lights on the test strip. If a second (positive) line exists, it will block the light from reaching a photosensor, so the system will display a positive result, i.e. the word “Pregnant.” What used to be a simple combo of plastic and pee-catching-substrate now has a built-in battery, a PCB with LEDs and sensors, and an LCD. That’s e-waste, folks.
After you get a result, what do you do? For the average American, that probably means chucking it into the bathroom trash, which becomes the curbside trash, which adds to the e-waste epidemic. If you want to do your part to limit the e-waste issues that plague the world, you’re stuck with a pee-soaked guilt machine. Do you take it to your local e-waste recycler—if it’s even open—or over to the e-waste bin at Best Buy? Not only is your reproductive history something you’d usually like to keep private, recyclers are probably not super stoked to knowingly handle urine. Do you want to take apart your pee stick yourself to extract that tiny coin battery? Let us know how it went, and how you fit that into your weekend.
All of these options stink, except one: skip the digital tests and vote with your wallet. Non-digital tests are just as fast and accurate, and have the bonus of being better for the environment. And don’t worry, someone has already installed Doom on a digital test, so we know there’s nothing more secretly useful inside.
8 comentários
They didn’t install doom onto it, they put it on a different ic and crammed it into the shell.
Joel - Responder
https://twitter.com/foone/status/1301713...
Joel -
While I understand the take, and the immediate knee-jerk reaction, I think Naomi Wu had a good point/response - this actually does increase the accuracy of the test, by virtue of eliminating a lot of the confusion and uncertainty and fear around having to learn how to read an analog test. Studies have shown that analog tests are only about 75% accurate due to reader/user error - and that puts the burden of education on people who might not be able to access it, as opposed to removing barriers.
https://twitter.com/RealSexyCyborg/statu...
aktariel - Responder
This sounds like the explanation the marketing team came up with to make this digital product slightly viable or have any sort of use case. If your first test was unclear, try another one. If one digital test is literally “digitally” readying the same strip, is 60 times more expensive, and environmentally harmful, I am sure one can try a few more tests or spend a few minutes educating themselves on how to read one or two strips on a strip of paper. Why will consumers be more responsible for their own behaviour?
Simran Wasu -
That reason seems like a load of BS to me. If the majority of all misreads is due to reader/user error, maybe those people shouldn’t be having children in the first place. If they can’t take 2 minutes to educate themselves on how to properly do a pregnancy test, and take another 30 seconds to learn how to correctly read the results, that is their problem. And creating even more things that will contribute to the overabundance of e-waste is NOT the correct response.
Read the directions!
Pee on the stick!
Wait however long it says to wait!
Read the directions AGAIN to make sure you are reading the results CORRECTLY!
insanetigertig -