Ir para o conteúdo principal
Ajuda

Versão atual de: Dan ,

Título:

USB3.0 SSD or internal SATA SSD?

Texto:

I’m trying to upgrade my late 2013 iMac (non fusion) from a mechanical HDD to SSD.
I have a Crucial MX500 SSD, now I’m wondering if it’s going to make a significant connecting this SSD as and internal one with SATA interface or will it not be that much a difference if I use a good USB 3.0 enclosure and boot off the SSD as an external one?
=== Update (06/15/2020) ===
+Did a speed test on BlackMagic for the Crucial MX500. These seems to be orders greater than the mechanical HDD that came along with the iMac.
+But the big question is, will I get better speeds if I use it internally with the SATA connect?
+
+[image|2135919]
+
+=== Update (06/15/2020) ===
The verdict is out! My 1 TB Crucial MX 500 SSD connected to the internal SATA 3 interface is faster than the external USB 3.0 enclosure. Below is the speed test in Blackmagic before and after I attached the internal SSD.
Before:
[image|2136226]
After:
[image|2136218]
My biggest concern was whether it was really worth the trouble of opening up an iMac myself just to get a minor (or maybe no) difference in speed. But looking at the result I am definitely satisfied.
While I had opened it up I thought I might as well change the RAM modules, so I got a Kingston 16 GB (2x8GB) SO-DIMM kit and fit it into my Mac. My Mac is simply blazing now. I am so happy with the results. I normally run Machine Learning algorithms on my machine and some processes like the k-fold cross validation takes about 20 mins, but now it is hardly a minute.
Some pics of my PC Internals:
[image|2136223]
[image|2136224]
[image|2136225]
-
-=== Update (06/15/2020) ===
-
-Did a speed test on BlackMagic for the Crucial MX500. These seems to be orders greater than the mechanical HDD that came along with the iMac.
-
-But the big question is, will I get better speeds if I use it internally with the SATA connect?
-
-[image|2135919]

dispositivo:

iMac Intel 21.5" EMC 2638

Status:

open

Resposta Aceita:

640892

Editado por: Chiranthan Ram ,

Título:

USB3.0 SSD or internal SATA SSD?

Texto:

I’m trying to upgrade my late 2013 iMac (non fusion) from a mechanical HDD to SSD.
I have a Crucial MX500 SSD, now I’m wondering if it’s going to make a significant connecting this SSD as and internal one with SATA interface or will it not be that much a difference if I use a good USB 3.0 enclosure and boot off the SSD as an external one?
=== Update (06/15/2020) ===
+
The verdict is out! My 1 TB Crucial MX 500 SSD connected to the internal SATA 3 interface is faster than the external USB 3.0 enclosure. Below is the speed test in Blackmagic before and after I attached the internal SSD.
Before:
[image|2136226]
After:
[image|2136218]
My biggest concern was whether it was really worth the trouble of opening up an iMac myself just to get a minor (or maybe no) difference in speed. But looking at the result I am definitely satisfied.
While I had opened it up I thought I might as well change the RAM modules, so I got a Kingston 16 GB (2x8GB) SO-DIMM kit and fit it into my Mac. My Mac is simply blazing now. I am so happy with the results. I normally run Machine Learning algorithms on my machine and some processes like the k-fold cross validation takes about 20 mins, but now it is hardly a minute.
Some pics of my PC Internals:
[image|2136223]
[image|2136224]
[image|2136225]
+
+=== Update (06/15/2020) ===
+
+Did a speed test on BlackMagic for the Crucial MX500. These seems to be orders greater than the mechanical HDD that came along with the iMac.
+
+But the big question is, will I get better speeds if I use it internally with the SATA connect?
+
+[image|2135919]

dispositivo:

iMac Intel 21.5" EMC 2638

Status:

open

Resposta Aceita:

640892

Editado por: Dan ,

Título:

USB3.0 SSD or internal SATA SSD?

Texto:

-I’m trying to upgrade my late 2013 iMac ( non fusion) from a mechanical HDD to SSD. I have a crucial mx500, now I’m wondering if it’s going to make a significant connecting this SSD as and internal one with SATA interface or will it not be much difference if I use a good USB 3.0 enclosure and boot off the SSD as an external one?
+I’m trying to upgrade my late 2013 iMac (non fusion) from a mechanical HDD to SSD.
+
+I have a Crucial MX500 SSD, now I’m wondering if it’s going to make a significant connecting this SSD as and internal one with SATA interface or will it not be that much a difference if I use a good USB 3.0 enclosure and boot off the SSD as an external one?
=== Update (06/15/2020) ===
-
The verdict is out! My 1 TB Crucial MX 500 SSD connected to the internal SATA 3 interface is faster than the external USB 3.0 enclosure. Below is the speed test in Blackmagic before and after I attached the internal SSD.
Before:
[image|2136226]
After:
[image|2136218]
My biggest concern was whether it was really worth the trouble of opening up an iMac myself just to get a minor (or maybe no) difference in speed. But looking at the result I am definitely satisfied.
While I had opened it up I thought I might as well change the RAM modules, so I got a Kingston 16 GB (2x8GB) SO-DIMM kit and fit it into my Mac. My Mac is simply blazing now. I am so happy with the results. I normally run Machine Learning algorithms on my machine and some processes like the k-fold cross validation takes about 20 mins, but now it is hardly a minute.
Some pics of my PC Internals:
[image|2136223]
[image|2136224]
[image|2136225]

dispositivo:

iMac Intel 21.5" EMC 2638

Status:

open

Resposta Aceita:

640892

Editado por: Chiranthan Ram ,

Título:

USB3.0 SSD or internal SATA SSD?

Texto:

I’m trying to upgrade my late 2013 iMac ( non fusion) from a mechanical HDD to SSD. I have a crucial mx500, now I’m wondering if it’s going to make a significant connecting this SSD as and internal one with SATA interface or will it not be much difference if I use a good USB 3.0 enclosure and boot off the SSD as an external one?

=== Update (06/15/2020) ===

The verdict is out! My 1 TB Crucial MX 500 SSD connected to the internal SATA 3 interface is faster than the external USB 3.0 enclosure. Below is the speed test in Blackmagic before and after I attached the internal SSD.

Before:

[image|2136226]

After:

[image|2136218]

My biggest concern was whether it was really worth the trouble of opening up an iMac myself just to get a minor (or maybe no) difference in speed. But looking at the result I am definitely satisfied.

While I had opened it up I thought I might as well change the RAM modules, so I got a Kingston 16 GB (2x8GB) SO-DIMM kit and fit it into my Mac. My Mac is simply blazing now. I am so happy with the results. I normally run Machine Learning algorithms on my machine and some processes like the k-fold cross validation takes about 20 mins, but now it is hardly a minute.

Some pics of my PC Internals:

[image|2136223]

[image|2136224]

[image|2136225]

dispositivo:

iMac Intel 21.5" EMC 2638

Status:

open

Resposta Aceita:

+640892

Editado por: Chiranthan Ram ,

Título:

USB3.0 SSD or internal SATA SSD?

Texto:

I’m trying to upgrade my late 2013 iMac ( non fusion) from a mechanical HDD to SSD. I have a crucial mx500, now I’m wondering if it’s going to make a significant connecting this SSD as and internal one with SATA interface or will it not be much difference if I use a good USB 3.0 enclosure and boot off the SSD as an external one?

=== Update (06/15/2020) ===

The verdict is out! My 1 TB Crucial MX 500 SSD connected to the internal SATA 3 interface is faster than the external USB 3.0 enclosure. Below is the speed test in Blackmagic before and after I attached the internal SSD.

Before:

[image|2136226]

After:

[image|2136218]

My biggest concern was whether it was really worth the trouble of opening up an iMac myself just to get a minor (or maybe no) difference in speed. But looking at the result I am definitely satisfied.

While I had opened it up I thought I might as well change the RAM modules, so I got a Kingston 16 GB (2x8GB) SO-DIMM kit and fit it into my Mac. My Mac is simply blazing now. I am so happy with the results. I normally run Machine Learning algorithms on my machine and some processes like the k-fold cross validation takes about 20 mins, but now it is hardly a minute.

Some pics of my PC Internals:

[image|2136223]

[image|2136224]

[image|2136225]

dispositivo:

iMac Intel 21.5" EMC 2638

Status:

open

Resposta Aceita:

-640966

Editado por: Chiranthan Ram ,

Título:

USB3.0 SSD or internal SATA SSD?

Texto:

I’m trying to upgrade my late 2013 iMac ( non fusion) from a mechanical HDD to SSD. I have a crucial mx500, now I’m wondering if it’s going to make a significant connecting this SSD as and internal one with SATA interface or will it not be much difference if I use a good USB 3.0 enclosure and boot off the SSD as an external one?

=== Update (06/15/2020) ===

The verdict is out! My 1 TB Crucial MX 500 SSD connected to the internal SATA 3 interface is faster than the external USB 3.0 enclosure. Below is the speed test in Blackmagic before and after I attached the internal SSD.

Before:

[image|2136226]

After:

[image|2136218]

My biggest concern was whether it was really worth the trouble of opening up an iMac myself just to get a minor (or maybe no) difference in speed. But looking at the result I am definitely satisfied.

While I had opened it up I thought I might as well change the RAM modules, so I got a Kingston 16 GB (2x8GB) SO-DIMM kit and fit it into my Mac. My Mac is simply blazing now. I am so happy with the results. I normally run Machine Learning algorithms on my machine and some processes like the k-fold cross validation takes about 20 mins, but now it is hardly a minute.

Some pics of my PC Internals:

[image|2136223]

[image|2136224]

[image|2136225]

dispositivo:

iMac Intel 21.5" EMC 2638

Status:

open

Resposta Aceita:

+640966

Editado por: Chiranthan Ram ,

Título:

USB3.0 SSD or internal SATA SSD?

Texto:

I’m trying to upgrade my late 2013 iMac ( non fusion) from a mechanical HDD to SSD. I have a crucial mx500, now I’m wondering if it’s going to make a significant connecting this SSD as and internal one with SATA interface or will it not be much difference if I use a good USB 3.0 enclosure and boot off the SSD as an external one?

=== Update (06/15/2020) ===

The verdict is out! My 1 TB Crucial MX 500 SSD connected to the internal SATA 3 interface is faster than the external USB 3.0 enclosure. Below is the speed test in Blackmagic before and after I attached the internal SSD.

Before:

[image|2136226]

After:

[image|2136218]

My biggest concern was whether it was really worth the trouble of opening up an iMac myself just to get a minor (or maybe no) difference in speed. But looking at the result I am definitely satisfied.

While I had opened it up I thought I might as well change the RAM modules, so I got a Kingston 16 GB (2x8GB) SO-DIMM kit and fit it into my Mac. My Mac is simply blazing now. I am so happy with the results. I normally run Machine Learning algorithms on my machine and some processes like the k-fold cross validation takes about 20 mins, but now it is hardly a minute.

Some pics of my PC Internals:

[image|2136223]

[image|2136224]

[image|2136225]

dispositivo:

iMac Intel 21.5" EMC 2638

Status:

open

Resposta Aceita:

-640892

Editado por: Chiranthan Ram ,

Título:

USB3.0 SSD or internal SATA SSD?

Texto:

I’m trying to upgrade my late 2013 iMac ( non fusion) from a mechanical HDD to SSD. I have a crucial mx500, now I’m wondering if it’s going to make a significant connecting this SSD as and internal one with SATA interface or will it not be much difference if I use a good USB 3.0 enclosure and boot off the SSD as an external one?

=== Update (06/15/2020) ===

The verdict is out! My 1 TB Crucial MX 500 SSD connected to the internal SATA 3 interface is faster than the external USB 3.0 enclosure. Below is the speed test in Blackmagic before and after I attached the internal SSD.

Before:

[image|2136226]

After:

[image|2136218]

My biggest concern was whether it was really worth the trouble of opening up an iMac myself just to get a minor (or maybe no) difference in speed. But looking at the result I am definitely satisfied.

While I had opened it up I thought I might as well change the RAM modules, so I got a Kingston 16 GB (2x8GB) SO-DIMM kit and fit it into my Mac. My Mac is simply blazing now. I am so happy with the results. I normally run Machine Learning algorithms on my machine and some processes like the k-fold cross validation takes about 20 mins, but now it is hardly a minute.

Some pics of my PC Internals:

[image|2136223]

[image|2136224]

[image|2136225]

dispositivo:

iMac Intel 21.5" EMC 2638

Status:

open

Resposta Aceita:

+640892

Editado por: Chiranthan Ram ,

Título:

USB3.0 SSD or internal SATA SSD?

Texto:

I’m trying to upgrade my late 2013 iMac ( non fusion) from a mechanical HDD to SSD. I have a crucial mx500, now I’m wondering if it’s going to make a significant connecting this SSD as and internal one with SATA interface or will it not be much difference if I use a good USB 3.0 enclosure and boot off the SSD as an external one?

=== Update (06/15/2020) ===

The verdict is out! My 1 TB Crucial MX 500 SSD connected to the internal SATA 3 interface is faster than the external USB 3.0 enclosure. Below is the speed test in Blackmagic before and after I attached the internal SSD.

Before:

[image|2136226]

After:

[image|2136218]

My biggest concern was whether it was really worth the trouble of opening up an iMac myself just to get a minor (or maybe no) difference in speed. But looking at the result I am definitely satisfied.

While I had opened it up I thought I might as well change the RAM modules, so I got a Kingston 16 GB (2x8GB) SO-DIMM kit and fit it into my Mac. My Mac is simply blazing now. I am so happy with the results. I normally run Machine Learning algorithms on my machine and some processes like the k-fold cross validation takes about 20 mins, but now it is hardly a minute.

Some pics of my PC Internals:

[image|2136223]

[image|2136224]

[image|2136225]

dispositivo:

iMac Intel 21.5" EMC 2638

Status:

open

Resposta Aceita:

-640864

Editado por: Chiranthan Ram ,

Título:

USB3.0 SSD or internal SATA SSD?

Texto:

I’m trying to upgrade my late 2013 iMac ( non fusion) from a mechanical HDD to SSD. I have a crucial mx500, now I’m wondering if it’s going to make a significant connecting this SSD as and internal one with SATA interface or will it not be much difference if I use a good USB 3.0 enclosure and boot off the SSD as an external one?
=== Update (06/15/2020) ===
+
The verdict is out! My 1 TB Crucial MX 500 SSD connected to the internal SATA 3 interface is faster than the external USB 3.0 enclosure. Below is the speed test in Blackmagic before and after I attached the internal SSD.
Before:
[image|2136226]
After:
[image|2136218]
My biggest concern was whether it was really worth the trouble of opening up an iMac myself just to get a minor (or maybe no) difference in speed. But looking at the result I am definitely satisfied.
While I had opened it up I thought I might as well change the RAM modules, so I got a Kingston 16 GB (2x8GB) SO-DIMM kit and fit it into my Mac. My Mac is simply blazing now. I am so happy with the results. I normally run Machine Learning algorithms on my machine and some processes like the k-fold cross validation takes about 20 mins, but now it is hardly a minute.
Some pics of my PC Internals:
[image|2136223]
[image|2136224]
[image|2136225]

dispositivo:

iMac Intel 21.5" EMC 2638

Status:

open

Resposta Aceita:

+640864

Editado por: Chiranthan Ram ,

Título:

USB3.0 SSD or internal SATA SSD?

Texto:

I’m trying to upgrade my late 2013 iMac ( non fusion) from a mechanical HDD to SSD. I have a crucial mx500, now I’m wondering if it’s going to make a significant connecting this SSD as and internal one with SATA interface or will it not be much difference if I use a good USB 3.0 enclosure and boot off the SSD as an external one?
+
+=== Update (06/15/2020) ===
+The verdict is out! My 1 TB Crucial MX 500 SSD connected to the internal SATA 3 interface is faster than the external USB 3.0 enclosure. Below is the speed test in Blackmagic before and after I attached the internal SSD.
+
+Before:
+
+[image|2136226]
+
+After:
+
+[image|2136218]
+
+My biggest concern was whether it was really worth the trouble of opening up an iMac myself just to get a minor (or maybe no) difference in speed. But looking at the result I am definitely satisfied.
+
+While I had opened it up I thought I might as well change the RAM modules, so I got a Kingston 16 GB (2x8GB) SO-DIMM kit and fit it into my Mac. My Mac is simply blazing now. I am so happy with the results. I normally run Machine Learning algorithms on my machine and some processes like the k-fold cross validation takes about 20 mins, but now it is hardly a minute.
+
+Some pics of my PC Internals:
+
+[image|2136223]
+
+[image|2136224]
+
+[image|2136225]

dispositivo:

iMac Intel 21.5" EMC 2638

Status:

open

Mensagem original de: Chiranthan Ram ,

Título:

USB3.0 SSD or internal SATA SSD?

Texto:

I’m trying to upgrade my late 2013 iMac ( non fusion) from a mechanical HDD to SSD. I have a crucial mx500, now I’m wondering if it’s going to make a significant connecting this SSD as and internal one with SATA interface or will it not be much difference if I use a good USB 3.0 enclosure and boot off the SSD as an external one?

dispositivo:

iMac Intel 21.5" EMC 2638

Status:

open