Ir para o conteúdo principal

Conserte seus objetos

Direito de executar reparos

Loja

Ajuda

Versão atual de: Dott. Vincenzo ,

Texto:

Hello! My MacBook Pro mid 2010, in system information, perfectly recognizes both the two modules of 8 GB of DDR HynniX-1066 RAM. Apparently, so far, the Mac has worked stably and very well with both High Sierra 10.3.6, but also with Mojave (using Mojave Patcher) and now works "apparently" well with MacOS 10.15 Catalina (with Catalina Patcher ).
 
But .. I HAVE DISCOVERED AN HIDDEN ISSUE. If I test the RAM using TechTool Pro or Rember (https://www.kelleycomputing.net/support/rember) or using memtest (included in Rember) I get the same results as this forum: https: // discussions.apple.com/thread/4906714.
 
So! Is it worth using 16GB in an old MacBook? ... I don't know ... Maybe for those who use this for fun or to surf the Internet. Certainly it is not a good thing to use it for work, knowing that RAM is not read well and that the Data could be corrupted.
 
=== Aggiorna (20/01/2020)UPDATE 20/01/2020 - SOLVED! ===
''Dear Koray,''

'''after

'''After
many tests I realized that the problem was caused only by a corrupt RAM bank'''.
=== Aggiorna (20/01/2020)UPDATE 20/01/2020 - SOLVED! ===
''Dear Koray,''

'''after

'''After
many tests I realized that the problem was caused only by a corrupt RAM bank'''.
 
So! '''You can ignore my previous post of October 18 2019'''.
 
The 2010 MacBook Pro, therefore, supports very well up to 16 GB of RAM provided ('''very important!''') if you have installed the latest version of the Firmware.
 
I solved perfectly with 16 GB of RAM purchased from Amazon. Exactly search with Google: Timetec Hynix IC Apple 16GB Kit (2x8GB) DDR3 PC3-8500 1066MHz memory upgrade for iMac 20 inch /21.5 inch / 24 inch / 27 inch, MacBook Pro 13 inch / 15 inc
 
(ItIt also exists only from 8GB)8GB. Excuse me, but if I insert you the Amazons’s Link it could happen that the I-Fixit robot blocks my message.
(ItIt also exists only from 8GB)8GB. Excuse me, but if I insert you the Amazons’s Link it could happen that the I-Fixit robot blocks my message.
 
Excuse me, butThis RAM is perfect! Now, if I insert youtest the Amazons’s Link it could happen thatRAM using TechTool Pro or Rember (from kelleycomputing.net site) or using memtest (included in Rember) the I-Fixit robot blocks my messageTest gives me a fast Clock (all 2-2-2-2 !!!!!!) like the best RAM used by Apple.
Excuse me, butThis RAM is perfect! Now, if I insert youtest the Amazons’s Link it could happen thatRAM using TechTool Pro or Rember (from kelleycomputing.net site) or using memtest (included in Rember) the I-Fixit robot blocks my messageTest gives me a fast Clock (all 2-2-2-2 !!!!!!) like the best RAM used by Apple.
 
This RAM is perfect! Now, if I test the RAM using TechTool Pro or Rember (from kelleycomputing.net site) or using memtest (included in Rember) the Test gives me a fast Clock (all 2-2-2-2 !!!!!!) likeOf course, you can also buy the bestgood RAM usedsold by Apple.i-Fixit :-)
This RAM is perfect! Now, if I test the RAM using TechTool Pro or Rember (from kelleycomputing.net site) or using memtest (included in Rember) the Test gives me a fast Clock (all 2-2-2-2 !!!!!!) likeOf course, you can also buy the bestgood RAM usedsold by Apple.i-Fixit :-)
 
''I hope I have helped you :-)''

Status:

open

Editado por: Dott. Vincenzo ,

Texto:

Hello! My MacBook Pro mid 2010, in system information, perfectly recognizes both the two modules of 8 GB of DDR HynniX-1066 RAM. Apparently, so far, the Mac has worked stably and very well with both High Sierra 10.3.6, but also with Mojave (using Mojave Patcher) and now works "apparently" well with MacOS 10.15 Catalina (with Catalina Patcher ).
 
But .. I HAVE DISCOVERED AN HIDDEN ISSUE. If I test the RAM using TechTool Pro or Rember (https://www.kelleycomputing.net/support/rember) or using memtest (included in Rember) I get the same results as this forum: https: // discussions.apple.com/thread/4906714.
 
So! Is it worth using 16GB in an old MacBook? ... I don't know ... Maybe for those who use this for fun or to surf the Internet. Certainly it is not a good thing to use it for work, knowing that RAM is not read well and that the Data could be corrupted.
 
=== Aggiorna (20/01/2020) ===
''Dear Koray,''
 
'''after many tests I realized that the problem was caused only by a corrupt RAM bank'''.
 
So! '''You can ignore my previous post of October 18 2019'''.
 
The 2010 MacBook Pro, therefore, supports very well up to 16 GB of RAM provided ('''very important!''') if you have installed the latest version of the Firmware.
 
I solved perfectly with 16 GB of RAM purchased from Amazon. Exactly search with Google: Timetec Hynix IC Apple 16GB Kit (2x8GB) DDR3 PC3-8500 1066MHz memory upgrade for iMac 20 inch /21.5 inch / 24 inch / 27 inch, MacBook Pro 13 inch / 15 inc
 
(It also exists only from 8GB)
 
Excuse me, but if I insert you the Amazons’s Link it could happen that the I-Fixit robot blocks my message.
 
This RAM is perfect! Now, if I test the RAM using TechTool Pro or Rember (from kelleycomputing.net site) or using memtest (included in Rember) the Test gives me a fast Clock (all 2-2-2-2 !!!!!!) like the best RAM used by Apple.
 
''I hope I have helped you :-)''

Status:

open

Editado por: Claire Rapp (detalhes da votação) ,

Texto:

Hello! My MacBook Pro mid 2010, in system information, perfectly recognizes both the two modules of 8 GB of DDR HynniX-1066 RAM. Apparently, so far, the Mac has worked stably and very well with both High Sierra 10.3.6, but also with Mojave (using Mojave Patcher) and now works "apparently" well with MacOS 10.15 Catalina (with Catalina Patcher ).

But .. I HAVE DISCOVERED AN HIDDEN ISSUE. If I test the RAM using TechTool Pro or Rember (https://www.kelleycomputing.net/support/rember) or using memtest (included in Rember) I get the same results as this forum: https: // discussions.apple.com/thread/4906714.

So! Is it worth using 16GB in an old MacBook? ... I don't know ... Maybe for those who use this for fun or to surf the Internet. Certainly it is not a good thing to use it for work, knowing that RAM is not read well and that the Data could be corrupted.

Status:

deletedopen
deletedopen

Editado por: Dott. Vincenzo ,

Texto:

Hello! My MacBook Pro mid 2010, in system information, perfectly recognizes both the two modules of 8 GB of DDR HynniX-1066 RAM. Apparently, so far, the Mac has worked stably and very well with both High Sierra 10.3.6, but also with Mojave (using Mojave Patcher) and now works "apparently" well with MacOS 10.15 Catalina (with Catalina Patcher ).

But .. I HAVE DISCOVERED AN HIDDEN ISSUE. If I test the RAM using TechTool Pro or Rember (https://www.kelleycomputing.net/support/rember) or using memtest (included in Rember) I get the same results as this forum: https: // discussions.apple.com/thread/4906714.

So! Is it worth using 16GB in an old MacBook? ... I don't know ... Maybe for those who use this for fun or to surf the Internet. Certainly it is not a good thing to use it for work, knowing that RAM is not read well and that the Data could be corrupted.

Status:

opendeleted
opendeleted

Mensagem original de: Dott. Vincenzo ,

Texto:

Hello! My MacBook Pro mid 2010, in system information, perfectly recognizes both the two modules of 8 GB of DDR HynniX-1066 RAM. Apparently, so far, the Mac has worked stably and very well with both High Sierra 10.3.6, but also with Mojave (using Mojave Patcher) and now works "apparently" well with MacOS 10.15 Catalina (with Catalina Patcher ).

But .. I HAVE DISCOVERED AN HIDDEN ISSUE. If I test the RAM using TechTool Pro or Rember (https://www.kelleycomputing.net/support/rember) or using memtest (included in Rember) I get the same results as this forum: https: // discussions.apple.com/thread/4906714.

So! Is it worth using 16GB in an old MacBook? ... I don't know ... Maybe for those who use this for fun or to surf the Internet. Certainly it is not a good thing to use it for work, knowing that RAM is not read well and that the Data could be corrupted.

Status:

open